Exploring Cultural Biases of the Global North on the Global South’s Wildlife Practices

Researcher(s)

  • Ethni Abiy, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Delaware

Faculty Mentor(s)

  • Angela Holland, Wildlife Ecology & Conservation, University of Delaware

Abstract

This research explores and critiques the negative cultural biases perpetuated by the Global North against the wildlife practices of the Global South. The central problem addressed is the misrepresentation and devaluation of Indigenous wildlife management practices in the Global South, which often stem from colonial-era ideologies and contemporary biases. This study questions why these practices are viewed through a prejudiced lens and aims to foster a more nuanced understanding and respect for diverse wildlife practices.

Previous research highlights the historical and ongoing conflicts between Western conservation efforts and Indigenous practices, emphasizing the need for a decolonized approach that values Indigenous knowledge. Key works such as Linda Tuhiwai Smith’s “Decolonizing Methodologies” and Mark Dowie’s “Conservation Refugees” offer critical insights into these issues, revealing how colonial legacies continue to shape current attitudes and policies.

The research employs qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews with anthropologists and wildlife experts from the Global South, as well as street-style interviews with local community members. This approach aims to uncover the realities of local wildlife practices and challenge the prevailing stereotypes imposed by the Global North.

The findings are expected to reveal significant insights into how Indigenous wildlife management practices are misrepresented and undervalued. By documenting and analyzing these practices, the study seeks to highlight their sustainability and efficacy, offering a counter-narrative to the dominant Western perspectives.

This research is significant because it addresses a critical gap in understanding and appreciation of Global South wildlife practices. It aims to dismantle harmful biases and promote a more equitable dialogue between cultures, ultimately contributing to a more inclusive and respectful approach to wildlife management.