Researcher(s)
- Izzy Cocuzza, Art, University of Delaware
Faculty Mentor(s)
- Aaron Terry, Art, University of Delaware
Abstract
Modern society has a primarily binary way of viewing decision making, labeling choices “logical” or “emotional.” My intention was to express the concept of emotions being inherently logical; not through a scientific explanation, but through architecture’s ability of capturing the duality of what seems “logical,” along with what actually is logical: human feelings and expression. Research involved observations, photography, writing, and drawing, which allowed me to further analyze the buildings I was taking note of and trying to further understand. The book includes sleek photos and illustrations alongside rougher sketches, written notes, and hand-printed media.
The results are a further understanding of humanity through architecture. The need for new while still preserving the old is a sentiment found between both people and their physical manifestations. Maintaining tradition is highly valued, though as people and society evolve, our needs and wants do as well, shown by the presence of both modern and ancient buildings in cities. Mathematical imperfections within structures also provided evidence for humanity, as human error became apparent in an otherwise safe and sturdy building. In regards to tall, modern skyscrapers, their overwhelming size and functionality reflect the relationship humans have with work and productivity. Society currently has a tendency of overvaluing both and placing utmost importance on them above all else, often including health.
The conclusion does not reinstate the notion of logic as need and emotion as want, rather it combines them all. Even the most scientifically and mathematically sound pieces in our society have a touch of humanity, despite some efforts to hide them. Further analyzing humanity as a whole is necessary to determine what makes a successful society, with success including both survival and quality of life.